Fundamentally a battery

Fundamentally a battery
is two different metals immersed in a corrosive fluid. Since elements tend toward their natural state these two FUJIFILM NP-60 battery metals exchange electrons through the fluid causing corrosion and the exchange of electrons is where we get electricity.

I am not certain but I think the reason we have trouble making a more efficient battery is because we haven't discovered or created any new metals to try to implement into a battery system. I think the next step in creating a more efficient battery would be the use of superdense metals because in order for a normal Casio Digital Camera Battery to last longer it needs to be larger.

Mind you I am no chemist, but I have toyed around with a few different ideas about how to configure a battery that would be longer lasting and more efficient simply out of curiosity, an Idea I had come up with is using series metals where at the top you have a metal that doesn't corrode well which is followed by a metal that has limited corrosion potential on through to a metal that is easily corroded.

This way once the first metal has surrendered electrons to the second, the second metal begins shedding electrons to the third and so on down the chain. Sort of a built in reserve for the Digital Camera Battery, but without a mechanism to efficiently test my suspicion, it is unknown what the result might be.

The question in this case implies a false fact.

There have been many innovations to batteries. The problem is, these innovations cost $$$. They use many exotic materials that in many cases can only be found in specific areas of the world (that is if we are talking about the typical mobile phone or flashlight battery). Just 10 years ago, my Nokia mobile phone had a 1 hour talk time and was the size of a water bottle. We have moved away from the NiCad batteries, through the NiMH, and now use Lithium ion. The FUJIFILM NP-80 battery is smaller than the palm of my hand and it powers what is essentially a portable computer that plays music, sends and receives email, plays games, browses the internet, takes pictures, oh and makes phone calls.

To make batteries cheaper, there needs to be "innovations" in nickel mining, or lithium, or any of the other exotic materials used (which of course is nearly impossible considering the price is derived from its scarcity).

I think its because Chemists cant keep up with Physicists! Physics has produced revolution after revolution in energy.

The real question this article should ask is: "where have Biologists been in this energy arena?" They have the most efficient example of FUJIFILM NP-30 battery energy transfer on earth to use as an model (the body's digestion of organic food) and yet they have not ever produced anything that can imitate or replicate that process!

A real breakthrough would be a car that runs on Grass by imitating the stomach of a grasshopper or a cow!

Talk about renewable energy!

But on this topic, I think the MIT discovery advancing the usefulness of fuelcells will be a much more efficient way of storing energy for our future. I think our cellphones will have fuelcells in the future.

Making and selling batteries is a business. Current batteries are probably making casio NP-30 battery producers top dollar right now so why keep upgrading and spending money on little improvements when demand is so high for what is available.

Even worse for manufacturers is what will they do if they develop batteries that are 10 times more efficient and use solar energy to recharge or maybe they sap energy from our movement? What happens is they make less money.

So I think we have the science to backup new and improved batteries.. I don't think we have manufacturers thinking the same untill they come up with a way to maximize money in their pockets.laptop battery details